Thomas McGee

The Syrian conflict has contributed to major debates in culture, media and politics around transitions linked to borders, ethnicity and identity. Against this backdrop, this article explores the use of ‘Rojava’, a keyword referring to Kurdish-majority areas in the country. It examines the term’s changing meanings and usage against the evolving backdrop of the governance project led by Kurds since the post-2011 power vacuum in North(eastern) Syria. The article identifies how the term has been both operationalized and later abandoned and replaced by other nomenclature while highlighting the implications of these changes on public and political discourse. The term ‘Rojava’ traces its origins to the context of (pan-)Kurdish nationalism, with its literal meaning of ‘western’ (Kurdistan) implying a notion of trans-border Kurdish identity. From this point of departure, the author considers how it has been popularized in ..[1]

=KTML_Link_External_Begin=https://www.kurdipedia.org/docviewer.aspx?id=606620&document=0001.PDF=KTML_Link_External_Between=Click to read ‘Rojava’: Evolving Public Discourse of Kurdish Identity and Governance in Syria=KTML_Link_External_End=