Shahrzad Mojab
The following second part of our analysis provides historical background information in order to better understand future options of the Kurds. We explain here in some detail why so far in contemporary history, virtually all efforts failed to achieve legitimate national rights for the Kurds and why they could and should not be repeated in the future. We basically show in sketched small historical chapters that Kurds to date could only win limited national rights, like some forms of autonomous regional self-rule. The reasons for that are in many aspects. Firstly, because they were used over centuries both by dominant central as well as foreign powers as proxies for their interests and also cooperated with them for own split aims. Second, because Kurds are chronically divided, constantly at loggerheads, disunited (Sheikhmous, 1992 & 2013: “united in disunity”) and fragmented. Thirdly, although they remain a considerable force of stability in Eurasia and the Middle East and are indeed underway to democracy they are still unable to come true majority rule of Western democracies. And last but not least, because they lack experience governing themselves and diplomacy to secure their own national rights with one strong united voice. [1]
=KTML_Link_External_Begin=https://www.kurdipedia.org/docviewer.aspx?id=87354&document=0001.PDF=KTML_Link_External_Between=Click to read Women and Nationalism in the Kurdish Republic of 1946=KTML_Link_External_End=
ئەم بابەتە بەزمانی (English) نووسراوە، کلیک لە ئایکۆنی
![](https://www.kurdipedia.org/images/flags/gb.png)
بکە بۆ کردنەوەی بابەتەکە بەو زمانەی کە پێی نووسراوە!
This item has been written in (English) language, click on icon
![](https://www.kurdipedia.org/images/flags/gb.png)
to open the item in the original language!
ئەم بابەتە 2,605 جار بینراوە
ڕای خۆت دەربارەی ئەم بابەتە بنووسە!