By Ulrik Volgsten & Oscar Pripp
This article takes its point of departure in Maurice Halbwachs’ notion of collective memory, adding the distinction made by Jan Assmann between communicative and cultural memory, and Alfred Schütz’s notion of communication, understood here as the sonorous communication of bodily affect. By combining and cross-fer-tilizing the concept of memory with that of affective experience, our aim is to take a new and productive perspective on music’s role as and in cultural memory as well as the crucial role played by affect attunement. As examples, we use inter-views and observations from an on-going research project on the role of music in ethnically-based associations in Sweden. In addition, we show how music often transgresses the categorical distinctions of collective memory. The main questions we ask are a) to the extent that there is a difference between music serving as a means for and as content of collective memory (what the memory is “about”), how can we account for and explain this difference? and b) how does verbally-narrated content relate to the sound of music when it comes to collective memory? [1]
کوردیپێدیا بەرپرس نییە لە ناوەڕۆکی ئەم تۆمارە و خاوەنەکەی لێی بەرپرسیارە. کوردیپێدیا بە مەبەستی ئەرشیڤکردن تۆماری کردووە.
ئەم بابەتە بەزمانی (English) نووسراوە، کلیک لە ئایکۆنی
بکە بۆ کردنەوەی بابەتەکە بەو زمانەی کە پێی نووسراوە!
This item has been written in (English) language, click on icon
to open the item in the original language!
ئەم بابەتە 326 جار بینراوە
ڕای خۆت دەربارەی ئەم بابەتە بنووسە!